Lloyd Ryan Question? Wed, Sep 15, 7:54 AM (1 day ago) |
Good morning, Myron.
I recall that you have in one of your documents that a Canadian researcher was rejected because someone didn't like what he had discovered wrt evidence of possible Norse migration in the Ungava area, and that government provided funds for another researcher to find alternative theories, even though the grad students of the second researcher said that the evidence supported the first.
What am I talking about?
Mybest wishes to you.
Lloyd Ryan
Thanks for the question.
You are writing about Thomas E. Lee. You have the episode correct.
https://lenape-epic.blogspot.com/2012/04/memorial-to-thomas-e-lee.html
And Patrick Plumet, the government supported researcher.
Lee reported the evidence he found accurately.
Plumet wrote a summary that omitted the evidence his graduate students found and wrote about in the report text.
Lee’s evidence in the Viking Visitors video was suppressed from most of the viewers for 31 years.
Sept 16
Lloyd,
The following links go to posts about Thomas E. Lee.
The Viking visitors to North America is the film about Thomas E. Lee’s discovery
These links and the Viking Visitors film are solid evidence that early American history has been suppressed for decades.
How can we convince history professors to investigate and write about the suppression rather than teach the suppressed version?
That action requires a change in paradigm. The more correct paradigm is that he Norse rowed to America six centuries before Columbus.
Suppression by omission removed the references to Norse from history texts, but not the physical evidence. That is why so much Norse evidence is still being found.
That is also why the Ancient American magazine could publish four decades of articles about “Archeology before Columbus.”
Every university history department should have a subscription to the Ancient American Magazine. Those departments, who do not, are still suppressing history by omission.
The professors continue the suppression by omission by teaching a flawed history that does not explain the published evidence.
A small group of us agree that the Norse were in America before Columbus.
How can we encourage the professors to revise history to include text to explain the Norse evidence?
s
Pamiok Island
https://lenape-epic.blogspot.com/2012/04/pamiok-island.html
EVIDENCE for GREENLAND and AMERICA pre-HISTORY
https://lenape-epic.blogspot.com/2011/12/evidence-for-greenland-and-america-pre.htmlhttps://lenape-epic.blogspot.com/2011/12/evidence-for-greenland-and-america-pre.html
VIKING VISITORS to NORTH AMERICA
https://wynlandwest.blogspot.com/2014/06/viking-visitors-to-north-america.html
No comments:
Post a Comment