OKLSHOMA RUNE STONES

OKLAHOM RUNE STONES
(Where they should not be.)

We have studied the Heavener Runestone.

.

There are three other rune stones found in Oklahoma.
. You can find information about the lesser Oklahoma rune stones by using the LENAPE Index.

.

LENAPE LAND>

LENAPE LEARNING (INDEX)>

Rune Stones>
         OKLAHOMA.

.

The index links also include the ELDER and YOUNGER FUTHARKS (RUNE ALPHABETS)

.

The text for the Elder Futhark says that the change to the Younger Futhark began about AD 800.

.

The text for the younger Futhark says that this alphabet was the Norseman rune set.  Also this article has a good comparison of the older and younger rune sets.
.

NOTE: That the Oklahoma rune stones have a mixture of old and younger runes.  This situation may have been consistent with the passage of King Hardada’s men, who may have camped in Oklahoma about AD1064.
.

The Eastern Oklahoma country is still good wintering land.  It has frost-free rivers, forests for wood and wild animals, and lakes for migrating birds and fishh, sunny hillsides and valleys to get out of the wind.  
.
King Hardada’s men would have found the land a pleasant place to rest through the hurricane season.

.

Note that all the modern day authorities think the stones are “modern.”
.
None suggested that the use of older and younger runes may date the stones to KING Hardada’s passage.

.

They also do not make a hypothesis that the stones, which are located in a land known for dust storms, may have been covered with dust for nine centuries.

.

Then the agricultural activity after the Oklahoma Land Rush may have turned over the Shawnee, Pawnee, and Poteau run stones.

What the “authorities” have done is come up with an answer:  “They are modern” that has convinced publishers to omit the Oklahoma stones and the older and younger Futharks from textbooks.

So four rune stones have been suppressed from textbooks because the “authorities” may have had the English MYTH in their head:  “These people were pagans, whose ancestors came from Asia.”  (I.e. the ancient ones would not have known Futharks.)

The English MYTH has apparently prevailed again.  Information that the kids should know has been suppressed by omission from textbooks.

Do YOU think the kids should be able to understand the Older and Younger
Futharks and examine the three other Oklahoma Runestones?