PROFOUNDLY DISTURBED HISTORY

Don Rankin, August 1, 2012:

.

Your comments do not surprise me. When I was a Ph.D. candidate I had two or three interesting instances. I did field work in the Boundary Waters in Minnesota and in Harris Wash in the Escalante system in Utah. In Harris Wash we found some interesting glyphs that I wanted to incorporate in my dissertation. Two of my mentors strongly dissuaded me. They feared that I would be denied my degree if I revealed what we had found. One comment was get your degree first THEN you can write what ever you like. The other mentor had concern that I was going to mention the Walaam Olam in my papers. I really had no intention of that but I found his concern and reasoning intriguing.

.

As you really dig into the past you can find out so many ways we have been misled. I could start a grocery list. The real persecution of Christians in Europe was tied to the ambitions of men like Constantine, Pope Innocent III, I believe that much of this could have a factor in some of these migrations. 

Myron Paine, August 1, 2012

.

Let us do that Dan,

.

Let us start a grocery list of the ways we have been misled by our academic historians.  Let us keep that list visible.

.

The profound disturbance of American history began with the  European  invasion of America.

.

1. The Spanish slaughter of Central and South Americans has been understated, The English historians in the early 1,600s wanted to make the Spaniard the bad example,   But he English could not truly believe the atrocities done to the Americans.  It took Spanish reporters to detail the damage.  Those reports came decades after the conquest.  They are fairly explicit if a person has the stomach to read them thoroughly.

.

So we will make a grocery list of  the English invation that began in 1585.

.

2.  Ralph Lane, the English military commander, rushed into an American council, put a pistol to the head of the American historian, and pulled the trigger.  Lane's men, who had sneaked around the council site in the dark, killed everybody they could catch.  

The Maalan Aarum, the oldest history in America, stopped that night.  A surviving American, who picked up the pictographs may have added the guns to the last pictograph that has a benign stanza, which wondered who these strangers were.

.

Thomas Harriot, at the risk of his own life, wrote, in a private memo to Queen Elizabeth, that, perhaps, the military men bad treated the Americans too harshly.  Queen Elizabeth, with the Spanish war looming, needed military men, who would take action.  But no official English ship returned to North America during her reign.

.

The prevailing academic position is "We do not know what happened to the lost colony."  We do know.  But the English of 1585-90 did not want the public to know.  So the profound distortion of American history began.  You will not learn much more after a visit to Roanoke today.  

[FYI, A map drawn by John White, in 1586, shows the word "Wenape" in the land to the north.  So the Lenape were at Roanoke.  The English of the 1650s did not want the people of England to know that people calling themselves "pure" were on the land the English were invading.  

.

White painted the "Mother in all temples."  The English in America in1650 did not want the English in England to know that information about Chistian like behavoir either.  White's painting is missing.  An etching by Du Bye, is entitled "Monster."  The Old Norse word that shows on the engraving means "Mother," probably as in. "Blessed is the Virgin Mary, MOTHER of Jesus.  

.

Americans believed in sexual experience before marriage.  Being a mother was sacred.
.

The academic community still believes the lying bastards.  Unfortunately most Americans today were educated by the English academic community.
.
For example, if you read books written by Americans such as God is Red, you will read the author's acceptance of the academic myth that Americans had no history.  The author attempts a weak rebuttal by citing the Pima, Sioux, and winter count histories, which the author accepts as history systems without much information.  The author also cites the Walam Olum as a possible history but puts the pictographs into the category of a myth.