Barry Fell’s books are NOT taught in most universities because, as Wikipedia explains,
“Archaeology survey
A survey of 340 teaching archaeologists in 1983, showed 95.7% had a "negative" view of Barry Fell's claims (considering them pseudo-archaeology), 2.9% had a "neutral" view, and only 1.4% had a "positive" view (regarding them as factual).”
The Archaeology survey of Barry Fell’s claims is NOT
evidence that Fell’s claims are peudo-archaeology. The survey is data which shows that most of the “teaching archaeologists” had the same false paradigm in their heads.
The evidence in America as reported by Fell and other
authors is sufficient evidence of contact on both sides of the Atlantic.
Besides the physical evidence, the Old Norse language is the source for names like Canada, Quebec, Minnesota, Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Mississippi, Alabama, Massachusetts, atnd Connecticut. Those Old Norse words are supporting evidence that Barry Fell’s claims are valid.
Most mainstream professors (95,7%) teach the false paradigm. Those professors were taught (and they teach) that there was NO pre-Columbian contact with the Old World.
The resulting false paradigm in most people’s head is a MYTH. Evidence shows the MYTH is not valid.
But evidence, which cannot be explained by the MYTH, is usually labeled a “hoax”or “pseudo-archaeology.” That valid evidence is not included in history books. Thus the MYTH goes on unchallenged while the factual evidence is ignored.
Most people, including professors, are not aware that valid evidence is being suppressed by omitting it from the history books.
The history MYTH is believed by about 96% of the people. So evidence of thousands of years of contact with the people on the east side of the Atlantic is suppressed. There is no public demand that the history books detail all the physical evidence “lost” to history scholars.
How can we get historians to change the MYTH?
No comments:
Post a Comment