Popular Posts

Friday, March 31, 2017

THE HANNO STONE

______ PART C______

The HANNO STONE

.
Did you learn what message might have been carved on the HANNO stone?
.
Did you ever know about the HANNO stone?
.
In AD 1348 The LENAPE huddling in James Bay KNEW. 
They knew how to get to the vicinity of the HANNO stone.  
.
Do you know that?
.
When we search for the HANNO stone, we find find Chinese Symbols on top of the list.  Huh?  Did the people with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm do THAT deliberately?
.
The third listing is:
.
Bourne Stone continues to baffle the experts
.
 Who would even investigate a "BOURNE" Stone?  
.
Well, I was desperate enough to try.
.Six paragraphs down I found:

"The Hanno theory, courtesy of Howard Barraclough "Barry" Fell, the late Harvard University biology professor who gained widespread notoriety in the 1970s with his theories about pre-Columbus visits to the Americas by folks from the Old World. In Fell's book, "America B.C.," Fell translated the Bourne Stone thusly: "A proclamation of annexation. Do not deface. By this Hanno takes possession."

.
NOTE:  The author with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm in his head labeled Barry Fell with the adjectives "widespread notoriety."  Fell was tried and convicted by someone with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS  paradigm in his head, but not the lifelong experience Fell had gained studying his passion in Europe and the South Pacific.  Fell was NOT tried by his peers!

Fell's conviction should be properly labeled.  Fell had violated the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm.


So let us search for the HANNO stone using the masking alias, BOURNE stone.

But, even if the web site is by a “Historical Society,” something is missing.  We are NOT told what was “punched in stone.”  People with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm are more comforable that way.
.
The Wikipedia item comes closer:
.
.
The result of whoever created the modern name for the stone--Bourne--is to obscure the HANNO name and the historical importance of the artifact.  
.Why is the HANNO stone "hidden away" under the windows of an obscure museum in New England?

Perhaps people with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm in their heads do NOT want other people to find or understand an artifact that exposes the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm.

I think the stone is a sure indicator that ancient boats from Spain and North Africa rowed to America hundreds of years before the English Invaded.  


.
The LENAPE in AD 1350 were following the route pioneered by millions of people people from the east side of the Atlantic.
.
But then the Wikipedia Author muddies things up by citing other researchers he implies that Fell did NOT have the correct translation.  The people with the PRISTINE WILDERNESS paradigm in their heads cannot accept Fell's conclusion.  The problem is NOT Fell's training, experience or conclusion.  The problem is the paradigm in the heads of people, who did NOT get William's training or had his experience.
.
The WICKED YANKEE uses his blog to get closer:
.

.
If you were on the thesis committee for a student reporting on the HANNO stone, which hypothesis would you choose to put into a schoolbook for kids?

No comments:

Post a Comment