Popular Posts

Monday, July 8, 2019

7/7/19 EMAIL to WASHINGTON POST: CENSORSHIP STILL WORKS

7/7/19 EMAIL to WASHINGTON POST: CENSORSHIP STILL WORKS
Dear Washington Post editors.

I submit to you this evidence that the Smithsonian is continuing to censor American history.
Those of us, who study American history, have known that the Smithsonian works for the "other side" for many years.
Today's events is an example that the censorship of history is still working.
I selected a post about the Lenape.

I made a comment:
"There are TWO histories of America: The LENAPE history (1000-1585) and the ENGLISH history (1609-present).
The English historians suppressed knowledge of the Lenape by omiting the words “LENAPE,” “Catholic,” and “Norse” from the printing presses. 
The LENAPE history survives as the “Walam Olum sacred texts”and as LENAPE LAND 
 which is a deciphered “Walam Olum.”

If your readers do NOT learn that:
 America has TWO histories, 
the Lenape history is preserved as the Walam Olum, sacred texts and in LENAPE LAND, 
when the English invaded, most Americans were Catholics, who spoke Norse, 
and the 17th century English suppressed “Lenape.” “Catholics.” and “Norse” words by omitting them from the printing presses, 
than YOU are publishing an historical MYTH designed to suppress Lenape, Catholics, and Norse words from historical knowledge."

The Smithsonian has marked the comment "PENDING." [They still are holding a similar comment made a month ago as "PENDING"]  "PENDING" is a form of suppression.  Few viewers know what is suppressed.]

[Another similar comment, which was made three months ago on this web site:
http://www.boweryboyshistory.com/2016/06/sad-tale-lenape-original-native-new-yorkers.html

is visible to viewers.]

By holding the comments in suppression, the Smithsonian has  suppressed the historical knowledge that there are two histories of North America and that Americans  were Catholics, who spoke Norse, when the English invaded.

I contend that I should have a valid comment published in a public post, so the topic may be discussed by other people, who are interested.  

By not accepting my comment, the Smithsonian has, once again, stifled discussion by using suppression by omission.
You, a newspaper, should be alert to the suppression happening in the District of Columbia.
Hopefully you will not let evidence of suppression be omitted.
Thank You

No comments:

Post a Comment