TEACH CATHOLICS, WHO SPOKE NORSE

Dear Department of History Chair,

 .

Does your faculty teach that when the English invaded, Americans were:

 1, pagans, who spoke Algonquin,

or

2, Catholics, who spoke Norse?

 .

If they teach “pagans, who spoke Algonquin,” then study this comment made 26 years ago:

 .

The peopling of America] "is reflected in scholarly writings ... so complete and second nature to most Americans that is has passed into popular lore and common knowledge of the "every schoolboy knows" variety. No attempt to distort the truth is any longer necessary.  All that is required, once a model is established, is the rote learning as [the knowledge] passes from one uncritical generation to the next. [American Holocaust, 1992, Stannard, David E.]

 .

The “pagans speaking Algonquin” is the 17^th century English MYTH that has “passed into popular lore and common knowledge.  No evidence supports the MYYH.

 .The 17^th century English did NOT want us to know that Catholics,             who spoke Norse, stood on the American shores.  The Pope’s Doctrine of Discovery allowed discovers to claim land occupied by pagans.  Hence, in English publications, Catholics became pagans and Algonquin masked the Norse language, which came from the east.

 .

The Catholics, who spoke Norse, option has hundreds of genuine Norse artifacts, a Norse history, 15,000 Norse words, DNA data showing that the people had similar DNA markers on both sides of the Atlantic, and a hypothesis with evidence about a PAN NORTH ATLANTIC CULTURE.

 .

The evidence can be found online at LENAPE HISTORY, LENAPE LAND, and at the FACEBOOK GROUP, entitled VIKING and the RED MAN.  There are links for a semester long history course via LENAPE LAND and evidence to show the Old North origin of the Algonquin language in the VIKING and the RED MAN DROPBOX.

 .

I encourage your faculty to encourage graduate students verify that the Catholics, who spoke Norse, were in America, when the English invaded.  

 .

Sincerely,

Dr. Myron D Paine
.

LENAPE LAND.

Algonquin is Old Norse

DID the LANGUAGE
come from the
WEST or EAST?

.
When the  English invaded, most Americans spoke Norse.

.

If  you believe that statement to be WRONG, you are carrying a 17th century English MYTH in your head.

.

The MYTH you believe is:

“American Indians were indigenous or descended from people who walked across the Bering Strait.  The

 “Indians spoke Algonquin.”

.

That MYTH has NO evidence to support it.

.

In 1940 Reider T. Sherwin published the first of eight volumes.  The volumes, “VIKING and the RED MAN” were sub titled “Old Norse origin of the Algonquin Language.”

.

Sherwin wrote in the forward of volume 4 that “…the Algonquin Indians language is Old Norse” and “the truth cannot be successfully attacked.”

.

The professors, who taught the teachers, who taught you, made NO attempt to understand or attack Sherwin.

.

Those professors had the ENGLISH MYTH in their heads.  They ignored 15,000  Norse words so they could teach the teachers to tell you that the original Americans must have walked over the Bering Strait!

.

If you are an “Indian” linguist. who is helping your tribe “save” or “restore” your original language, your are dealing with Norse words. 

.

But, because you believe the MYTH, you find it difficult to believe the origin of your words came via people in rowboats from the east.

.

Craig Judge and I used Sherwin’s words to determine that the first 40 stanzas of the LENAPE history (a.k.a. Walam Olum) were Genesis and to decipher 38 history stanzas.

.

The 38 history stanzas are a clear, concise, and complete history of Greenland people, who spoke Norse, migrating across Davis Strait to America.

.

The LENAPE history has 14th century written text, man-modified waterways, many whetstones and thousands of stones with holes in them, a genuine rune stone, and a viking sword , that support the history created by the 14th century LENAPE historians.

.

With all that evidence on the table, WHY do you still believe the MYTH?

.

Your Language is alive and well.  The teachers in Iceland teach it to kids every day.

.

Do your tribal members a BIG favor.

.

Tell them that:

1. The original Algonquin Language was Old Norse.

.

2.  The relationship between Algonquin and Old Norse is in the VIKING and the RED MAN, which is online.

.

3.   Tell ALL your kids that the original language was Old Norse.  The Norse rowed into America

1,000 years ago.

.

4. Tell the teachers that the origin of your language came from people who rowed to America  from the east.

.

Sincerely yours,

MYRON,

LENAPE LANGUAGE

The FREE DICTIONARY defines "Mississippi" as a river and a state.
TheFREE DICTIONARY does not tell the viewers the origin of the LENAPE words.  So the viewer DOES NOT know the origin of the LENAPE words was Old Norse.
Old Norse is a language very much alive.  It is taught to kids in Iceland.
.
For Missouri, 

divide the name into MIS @MESV2079a and SOURI @ SOUV1299a.

For Mississippi use the MIS above

MISTA = of LARGE dimensions

and look for SIP @ SIPV113 and  SIPV3114

SVIPA = SWIFTLY

So the original meaning of Mississippi may have been to "start on a large river and to travel swiftly."

That definition fits meaning the MISSISSIPPI word of a thousand years ago.
.
Defining the Mississippi as a river does not explain what the original sounds meant.  Defining Mississippi as a state would not have been a workable concept 1OOO years ago.

Rieder T. Sherwin's statement that the Old Norse is the source of the Algonquin Language is more valid than the FREE DICTIONARY definitions.

The FREE DICTIONARY continues to support the English MYTH that the LANAPE Language came from indigenours people or people, who walked to American from Asia.
Sherwin complied 15,000 LENAPE sounds to prove that Old Norse was the origin of the Algonquin language.
.
The pervasive English MYTH is taught by nearly all professors, who learned the MYTH from their authorities, their teachers.

NOTRE DAME vs the MYTH

Hi, 440 members of AMERICAN HISTORY ORG.

ON MONDAY, OCT.15, 2018
I emailed the following message to:
.
Dear Professor Coleman,

          Chair, Professor in American Studies

Cc:  Ms Ryan, Dept Coordinator,

Assoc. Prof Pensado,

             Director of Graduate Studies,

 Mr. Vaughn, Gradate Studies, Coordinator.

.

SUBJECT:  Topics for investigation for Notre Dame Graduate Studies in history.

.

Notre Dame is located in a region where Catholics, who spoke Norse, settled in America 1000 years. ago.  Notre Dame should take the lead in restoring a more accurate history of the American past.

.

Please guide your graduate students to restore the knowledge of the LOST GREENLAND CATHOLIC COLONY.

.

The LOST GREENLAND VIKING COLONY

became the AMERICAN CATHOLICS, WHO SPOKE NORSE.

The ENGLISH KNEW, but called them “Indians”

and used suppression by omission to create a MYTH. 

Accurate knowledge of the American past became

A DROP in the OCEAN of MYTH.

.

Notre Dame graduate students should be able to determine that the LOST GREENLAND CATHOLIC COLONY is based on valid evidence. 

.

If the evidence is valid, Notre Dame could take the leading role to restore a more accurate history of Catholics in the American past.

.

Have good studies,

MYRON, @ LENAPE LAND

.

PS Please acknowledge receipt of the email.
________________

Now, (Oct. 22) it is a week later.  I have no reply.

"No reply" is like the "omission" word in "suppression by omission."

We are being suppressed because the faculty at Notre Dame is IGNORING (OMITING) the chance to communicate with us.
The Professors contine to teach the MYTH, because they have not examined the evidence.
.
So, what do we do now?

Flooding Notre Dame with 440 emails does not seem like the correct way to get attention.

They have already demonstrated they are likely to ignore emails, even if they are written by a person who has earned a Ph. D.

A telephone call may be called a "crank call."  Then our message may be quickly forgotten.

Maybe the best way is for each of us to take the following action:
1. Copy the text below, paste it into textedit or word, & PRINT:

"The LOST GREENLAND VIKING COLONY

became the AMERICAN CATHOLICS,
WHO SPOKE NORSE.

The ENGLISH KNEW, 
but called them “Indians”

and used suppression by omission 
to create a MYTH. 

Accurate knowledge of the American past became

A DROP in the OCEAN of MYTH."

.
2. ADD A SHORT POSITIVE STATEMENT BY HAND.
3. Sign the page.
3. Send the PRINTED PAGE to:
NOTRE DAME HISTORY DEPARTMENT
219 O'Shaughnessy Hall
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame IN 46556

4.  Pray--a lot.

POCAHANTAS

The True Story of Pocahontas:

Historical Myths Versus Sad Reality

INDIAN COUNTRY TODAY

A more accurate story of the life of POCAHONTAS can the found at the post found by the link above the picture.
.
But before you look at the post, make a little adjustment to your mental model of America in the 17th Century.
.

Most Americans were Catholics, who spoke Norse.  Most Catholics recited the 144 stanzas of their history from pictographs which showed them cues to the correct self-verifying verse to say.  Out of 144 stanzas cued by pictographs, 121 showed people with three marks on their heads- for the Catholic Father-Son-Holy ghost .

The marks stood for the _"Father-Son-Holy Ghost" of the Catholic rituals.  

.

In 17th century America, men and some women, created hair-do’s to reflect their spiritual commitment.  There are a few pictures of early colonial times in America that show men with three feathers.
. The 17th century English would have known that Americans were Catholics from the hair-dos.

.

Many pictures of that era show evidence of picture “retouching.”
.
In the picture above most of the "feathers" appear to be fluffy feathers.  Fluffy feathers come from ostriches or peacocks, which did not live in America.
A valid assumption is that someone, who wanted to obscure the "Father-Son-Holy Ghost hair-dos, deliberately retouched the original picture.
.
There appears to be only one original set of feathers, which is on the fourth face to the right, next to the picture edge.
.
.The original three feathers on each head may have been changed to five feathers by adding two more.
.

Notice in the picture that two of the feathers, on on each side, have the same color.
.

The fourth face to the right appears to show part of a three feather head set, which has a diffent style. The re-toucher may have decided to let the original painting alone.
.

There is a second painting in the Pocahontas post.  In that painting Pocahontas wears three black feathers.
.
This may be an instance where the re-touched hair-do was itself re-touched to return to the original picture.
.

When it comes to feathers on heads in colonial scenes, we can NEVER be sure that feathers more than three were in the original artist’s drawing.
.

Count the feathers, assume fluffy feathers were an attempt to hide a Father, Son, Holy Ghost hair do, examine multiple feathers to see if the retoucher might been decieving us.  The retoucher wanted us to believe that the Catholics, who spoke Norse were NOT in the picture.

Now tap on the link above the picture to se theINDIAN COUTRY TODAY version of the story. Then return to here.

This is Danica's version of text found on Kathy's wall.  They appear to have used the INDIAN COUTRY text for most of their story.

Danica Niketic

September 16 at 7:57 AM

From Kathy Sloan'

Danica Niketic

September 16 at 7:57 AM

From Kathy Sloan's wall:

Fascinating truth about who Pocahontas really was from indigenous history. She was 10 years-old in 1607 when the settlers invaded & John Smith was 27; she never tried to save his life nor married him. She was kidnapped by English colonizers, gang raped & had a son from one of the rapes named Thomas. John Smith raided local tribal villages & literally held a gun to their chiefs' heads, demanding all their food & supplies. The English men targeted young children for rape & many Native women offered themselves for rape in order to spare their children from being raped. Rape was not tolerated by Powhatan society & was virtually unheard of since the penalty was so severe.

Pocahontas married a neighboring tribal member named Kocoum & they had a daughter. The colonists kidnapped Pocahontas & murdered her husband. While she was held captive, the Jamestown colony was failing & John Rolfe was under orders to make it profitable or England would cut off support. He realized that if he could learn the indigenous secret of how to cure tobacco, he'd be saved so he married Pocahontas to get their secret which was considered sacred. Soon after, he made a killing exporting tobacco to England & Jamestown was saved. Tragically for the local tribes, this new goldmine resulted in massive theft of Native lands & slaughter.

Unlike the colonists who were committing large-scale atrocities against the indigenous people, elites in England disapproved & threatened to cut off financial support if it continued. For this reason, Pocahontas, her son Thomas, her sister, John Rolfe, & Captain John Argall - the man who kidnapped Pocahontas - sailed to England along with other Natives to pretend friendship in order to prevent their $ cut-off. Essentially, a dog & pony show. Pocahontas knew she was being exploited & wanted to return home. Right after a dinner with John Rolfe & Argall, she vomited & died shortly after; her sister & the other Natives concluded she'd been murdered by poisoning. The indigenous people who traveled to England with her were sold as servants or carnival attractions. If the women got pregnant as a result of rape, they were sent to Bermuda & sold into slavery.

Pocahontas died at 20 & Rolfe & Argall refused to return her body to be buried among her people in her homeland. News reached her father Wahunsenaca & he died of grief less than a year later. Her son Thomas was kept in England but he returned to the Powhatan as an adult. Her daughter was raised by the neighboring Patawomeck tribe.

Yet another in the endless parade of lies that are taught as "history" by the American imperialists.

***************

Now here is my version based on the book "Virginia Adventure" by Hume.

American History Organisation. 

.

Pocahontas’History from Kathy Sloan’s wall.

.

Kathy and I agree to about 80% of her story. We might agree 100% after we discuss our mental model of Colonial America
In Colonial America, the people on the shore were Catholics, who spoke Norse.

.

Pocahontas played an Angel in a Catholic ritual
that convinced John Smith that he had been born again. 

.

Smith became so zealous that his own men fire-bombed his groin. His swift reactions enabled him to plunge into the water beside the boat to save his life.

.
Argil transported Smith to England. Argil might have been the one telling the English that Americans were Catholics, who spoke Norse.

.
The Norse words in Smith’s book were censored by the English and replaced by English words.

.
A few years later Argil captured Pocahontas because he wanted "to have her," whatever that meant.  He raped her repeatedly.

.

 Then Argil gave her to Thomas Dale, the commander of the 300 fully armored men, who destroyed the villages along both sides of the

James River from Jamestown to Richmond,Va.

At Henrico they took over the "magnificent Church" build by Bishop Henricus five centuies earlier.

Thomas kept Pocahontas
in the Catholic Church. He raped her often.

Then Thomas learned that a women with money and land in England would be willing to marry a famous soldier.

.
Thomas attempted to trade Pocahontas back to Powhatten in return for a statement, from Powhatan, that the Catholics would accept Protestant rites. 

Pocahontas told her half brothers that she was pregnant and Powhatten's people would have to kill her.

.

She counseled Powhaten to leave her with Thomas.

.

Powhaten moved his people away.

.

Thomas wanted the money and land in England. He asked who will take this .woman."

.

 John Rollfe did.

.

 Pocahontas was married to John, but she named her son after the father, “Thomas.”
.
Now, even if Kathy, I, and a few of you get Pocahontas story very accurate, the professors will still teach the MYTH they were taught. They will continue to suppress the more accurate story by omitting the story from the textbooks and curriculum.

.
Your kids or grandkids cannot earn a history scholarship by answering “Thomas Dale raped Pocahontas.”
Early American history is a MYTH! We ALL have been MYTHIFIED!

*****************

Now here is what a descendant has to say about the rape of her ancestor.

Anita Vanput: Her son had a daughter married into Poythress ,if I have got this straight.

She had married a brother? of my direct ancestor ....so the descent would have been [now ] very distant cousins.

Interesting .We wish we could change the past of the kindred as far as their suffering ...Or of anyone ..that has been so treated .....But,it is doubtful if any of descent if they still exist ,that they are but Caucasoid types.
 now.

Anita,
The past is gone and cannot be changed.
But an accurate knowledge of the past should not be omitted from history.

We have

1. Indian Country Today,
2. Kathy,
3. Danica,
4. You, Anita,
5.  Me, Myron,
6.  American History Organization with 310 members.

We should start a campaign to publish the accurate Pocahontas story as often as possible.

You represent the Pocahontas family.  Do you have ideas about what, where, when, and how we can publish the accurate Pocahontas story?

LETTER TO DEPARTMENT HEADS

Dear Department head.

.

 On Aug 24, 2018, 4:20pm, I wrote the departments of History and Linguistics at Berkeley University and seven individual Berkeley faculty, who appeared to be teaching courses in Early American history.

.

 I wanted data to illustrate a PROBLEM with university Social Science departments.

.

You might not think there is a problem.  After all, the United States educational system taught us to put men on the moon and machines on Mars.
.
.But those results came from the physical sciences departments.  I served two physical science departments for many years.  I did not see any problem then, but I did hear of the “silos” of the Social Science professors.

.

But when I begin to study the LENAPE History, I did detect a problem. 

.

I have a Ph.D.  I have had my name listed in Who’s Who in America.  I had communicated with my physical science peers.  I cannot remember that anyone in the physical scientist profession ever chose to ignore a communication from me.

But when I tried to find someone in the Social Scientists professions to help me decipher the sounds of the LENAPE history, social science professors did not reply!

Only one institution, Kean University, responded as I had hoped academic professors would.  One of the Kean students learned how to also decipher the recorded Lenape sounds. 

.

One passage was difficult to understand, but the student persisted.  He found a definition of the sounds to be, “multitude of rivers.” 

That definition confirmed that the Lenape history involved James Bay, Canada, where 21 rivers flow into the James Bay depression.

.

So, while Kean University, is the shining example of how a university faculty and students should investigate an unresolved situation, behavior of most of the other Social Scientist professors is the subject of this article.

.

That behavior is the PROBLEM.

.

On Aug 24, I wrote,

“Berkeley FACULTY in Anthropology, History, and Linguistics.

.

I have researched the question, “Where did the 4000 Greenlanders, who vanished from Greenland in 1346- 50, go?”

I deciphered stanzas of the Lenape history and I taught a student in Kean University to decipher several more stanzas.  

…

I invite a few of your graduate students to visit me for the purpose of discussing the evidence, the Lenape history and another version of history.

RSVP”

.

Once again I have been disappointed when events happened as I expected.

.

NO ONE from Berkeley’s Social Scientist departments answered me.  I have been IGNORED—again!

.

That is my PROBLEM, but that behavoir might cause your problem.

.

Why is ignoring an outsider with excellent academic qualifications a PROBLEM?

.

Because the Social Scientist professors are continuing to teach four MYTHS:

.

1. America has          no history 
     before 1500.

2.  In ancient
     America, no 
     one left an
     artifact, which
     came from the
      east side of
       the Atlantic.

.

3.  No one in               ancient
     America

     spoke words
     from the east

     side of the
      Atlantic.

4.  The DNA of
     “native”

       Americans
       comes from
       Asia.

.

ALL of these MYTHS are not valid.  Evidence and testimony to prove these MYTHS invalid can be found by kids searching the internet. 

.

Yet Social Scientists at Berkley and most other universities will be teaching these MYTHS this fall.

.

They will teach the MYTHS and IGNORE those of us, who would like to discuss their PROBLEM with them.

.

“Suppression by omission,” is a simple but effective propaganda method.

.

When the 17^th century English discovered that the Americans were Catholics, who spoke Norse, the 17^th century English employed suppression by omission for more than a century.

.

When a Social Scientist professor IGNORES communications from an outsider, that professor is continuing to suppress by omission.

.

The MYTHS the Social Scientist professors will teach this fall do not explain the evidence now available to the kids.  But those professors are OMITTING the evidence by IGNORING communications.

.

As a chair in a Social Science Department you should be concerned about the many people, who can find the evidence on-line and who will tell others not to study at the departments that continue to teach MIYTHS, without evidence.

.

Your department, may, eventually, be suppressed by lack of funds.

Then my PROBLEM, the behavoir of your faculty, may become YOUR problem.

.

Have a good one,

MYRON, @ LENAPE LAND