 | "Geologic" Curiosities in North Dakota NORTH DAKOTA NOTES NO. 17 See at https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndgs/ndnotes/ndn17_h.htm Then return here. The North Dakota authors had the "No CONTACT before Columbus" paradigm in their heads. Thus they did NOT know about TIFINAGH characters. https://myronpaine.blogspot.com/2020/11/ft-ransom-rock-with-tifinagh-marks.html Tifinagh script is found in North Africa, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tifinagh the Baltic Sea. and America. Examples are shown in Barry Fell's book, America, BC, and on the SHAWNEE SACRED SLAB. https://minnesotawaterway.blogspot.com/2018/07/shawnee-slab-1.html The TIFINAGH script came to America about the time of Christ. The rocks at Ft. Ransom lay at a spot that may have been located at the portage place from the Sheyenne River to the James River. When the travelers moved their boats over the 22 miles they would be floating on water all the way home to North Africa. Those professors,who thought that Barry Fell was writing psuedo-anthropolgy and do NOT teach the TIFINAGH script are suppressing the ancient history of America and are not teaching their students the knowledge needed to solve the curiosities of America. |
Popular Posts
-
PAY ATTENTION! . "OTTAWA RESEARCHER'S FIRI NG DERAILS VIKING PROJECT . " . This wrong action may change the p...
-
The Lok Map is evidence that thousands of Norse Catholics walked and several hundred boats were crew- rowed to Norumbega (a.k.a. ... -
were made in 1979 by twenty-seven of the best scholars on ancient America. * Their conclusions were: Norse were in North America 1,...
Thursday, November 26, 2020
"Geologic" Curiosities in North Dakota
Wednesday, November 25, 2020
CONTACT NET
CONTACT NET
Because the the Ft. Ransom Rock has Tifinaq script we have an opportunity to develop a “Contact net.”
A “contact net” is an email net where the receiver of an email forwards the email to five (5) other contacts, who believe there was contact before Columbus.
Each of those contacts then forwards the email to five other contacts.
And so on.
The concept is that new information about the Ft. Ransom rock will be transmitted through the net. So all people on the net will know the up-to- date knowledge.
For Example
Myron to Gary:
Gary to
Gary 1,
Gary 2,
Gary 3,
Gary 4,
Gary 5
Gary 1 to Gary
11, 12, 13, 14,15
Gary 2 to Gary
21, 22, 23, 24,25
Gary 3 to Gary 31, 32, 33, 34,35
Gary 4 to Gary
41, 42, 43, 44,45
Gary 5 to Gary 51, 52, 53, 54,55
And so on.
The advantage of a contact net is:
*Those people in the net will share the same
knowledge with a minimum of effort.
* Each of the contacts need only to forward
incoming emails to the same five recipients.
*Knowledge of evidence will be known by many people.
PLEASE tell the sender of your incoming email invitation that you, too, believe in contact before Columbus and you will forward incoming emails to five contacts that you will ask to join the CONTACT NET.
Friday, November 20, 2020
Wednesday, November 18, 2020
SURVEY SHOWED MOST PROFESSORS TEACH THE MYTH
Barry Fell’s books are NOT taught in most universities because, as Wikipedia explains,
“Archaeology survey
A survey of 340 teaching archaeologists in 1983, showed 95.7% had a "negative" view of Barry Fell's claims (considering them pseudo-archaeology), 2.9% had a "neutral" view, and only 1.4% had a "positive" view (regarding them as factual).”
The Archaeology survey of Barry Fell’s claims is NOT
evidence that Fell’s claims are peudo-archaeology. The survey is data which shows that most of the “teaching archaeologists” had the same false paradigm in their heads.
The evidence in America as reported by Fell and other
authors is sufficient evidence of contact on both sides of the Atlantic.
Besides the physical evidence, the Old Norse language is the source for names like Canada, Quebec, Minnesota, Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Mississippi, Alabama, Massachusetts, atnd Connecticut. Those Old Norse words are supporting evidence that Barry Fell’s claims are valid.
Most mainstream professors (95,7%) teach the false paradigm. Those professors were taught (and they teach) that there was NO pre-Columbian contact with the Old World.
The resulting false paradigm in most people’s head is a MYTH. Evidence shows the MYTH is not valid.
But evidence, which cannot be explained by the MYTH, is usually labeled a “hoax”or “pseudo-archaeology.” That valid evidence is not included in history books. Thus the MYTH goes on unchallenged while the factual evidence is ignored.
Most people, including professors, are not aware that valid evidence is being suppressed by omitting it from the history books.
The history MYTH is believed by about 96% of the people. So evidence of thousands of years of contact with the people on the east side of the Atlantic is suppressed. There is no public demand that the history books detail all the physical evidence “lost” to history scholars.
How can we get historians to change the MYTH?
Tuesday, November 17, 2020
MIND OVER MATTER
America has many histories:
The histories explained by Barry Fell,
The LENAPE history, and
The MYTHICAL history taught by most
university professors.
BARRY FELL’S HISTORY
Barry Fell’s history is not taught in most universities because, as Wikipedia explains,
“Fell is best known for his pseudoarchaeological work in New World epigraphy, arguing that various inscriptions in the Americas are best explained by extensive pre-Columbian contact with Old World civilizations. His writings on epigraphy and archaeology are generally rejected by those mainstream scholars who have considered
them.”
Our problem is the false paradigm taught by university professors. They believe and TEACH that there was NO extensive pre-Columbian contact with Old World civilizations.
Barry Fell was rejected by professors who had the false paradigm that NO ONE came to America from the east side of the Atlantic before Columbus.
In a mind over matter contest, the mind can reject all evidence as a “hoax.” So NO amount of pyhsical evidence can change the false paradigm.
More evidence will not change the false paradigm.
Sending emails to one professor at a time will not change the false paradigm. (I have tried that for a decade.)
Annual meetings of a society to preserve ancient artifacts will not change the false paradigm. The professors with the false paradigm in their heads do not attend the meetings.
Thirty-eight years of Ancient America publication did not change the false paradigm. Most history departments do not subscribe to the Ancient America Magazine.
How can we change the false paradigm?